Fix potential exception when casting to string. Ensure getter/setter are called with proper context. Add support for 'remove all properties' in json-prune scriptlet. The required information is too much to be conveyed with bundling these extensions. Add any-delay to timeout/interval boosters. Users who actively seek out and install these extensions will, by the nature of actively seeking out and installing extensions, do enough reading and have a sense of what's what. Again, bundling it with Waterfox risks blurring that line. uBOL is entirely declarative, meaning there is no need for a permanent uBOL process for the filtering to occur, and CSS/JS injection-based content filtering. You can add more rulesets by visiting the options page - click the Cogs icon in the popup panel. So you get Scrollbars where there shouldnt be. The resizing on it, and other sites are wrong. How can I go back to the older version Also, Discord layout has been broken for a while on Waterfox Classic. For example, you can block 3rd party cookies, install ad blocking extensions and then block tracking tools, delete browsing data regularly, enable Tracking Protection in your browser etc.Īnd as TheQuickFox mentioned, this extension may come with a risk of breaking websites, so users would need to be able to distinguish between "I don't care about cookies" false positives and Waterfox bugs. uBO Lite (uBOL) is a permission-less MV3-based content blocker. The latest classic version seems to have broken Ublock Origin. Please educate yourself about cookie related privacy issues and ways to protect yourself and your data. I don't use "I don't care about cookies" myself, but its website acknowledges the need for users to be informed -īy using it, you explicitly allow websites to do whatever they want with cookies they set on your computer (which they mostly do anyway, whether you allow them or not). Bundling uBlock Origin with Waterfox would blur that important line for users who don't understand uBlock Origin well enough. Users would need to be able to tell the difference between that and Waterfox bugs, which again requires the user to be somewhat informed. Even if it were preconfigured to only block ads, there is still the issue of false positives and breaking websites. Using a completely new profile in Firefox with uBlock Origin works fine, so it does not appear to be only a uBlock Origin problem. Trying to describe its blocking by a single purpose doesn't cover it. In the case of uBlock Origin, it is far more than just an ad blocker. uBO and HTTPS everywhere work in wf classic. Maybe a dialog could ask the user at first startup: Yes they do, but with some extensions, such as uBlock Origin, you should use a legacy branch of it for all the functionality to work correctly.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |